#Milf warrior princess free#
It is a number of pages InnoDB tries to keep free in each buffer pool instance to speed up read and page creation operations. A better name would be innodb_free_page_target_per_buffer_pool. ( innodb_lru_scan_depth ) = 1,536 - innodb_lru_scan_depth is a very poorly named variable.
" may be fixable by lowering lru_scan_depth: Consider 1000 / innodb_page_cleaners (now 1). "InnoDB: page_cleaner: 1000ms intended loop took. ( innodb_lru_scan_depth * innodb_page_cleaners ) = 1,536 * 1 = 1,536 - Amount of work for page cleaners every second. ( innodb_buffer_pool_instances is ignored in 10.5.1.) ( innodb_buffer_pool_size / innodb_buffer_pool_instances ) = 9728M / 1 = 9728MB - Size of each buffer_pool instance. (To low is less efficient too high risks swapping.) ( innodb_buffer_pool_size ) = 9,728 / 32768M = 29.7% - % of RAM used for InnoDB buffer_pool ( Open_tables / table_open_cache ) = 5,205 / 247485 = 2.1% - Cache usage (open tables + tmp tables)
( table_open_cache ) = 247,485 - Number of table descriptors to cache It seems to be occurring (on average) twice a minute. OPTIMIZE TABLE is virtually useless, and is invasive. (Cf Com_show_variables, Com_show_generic, Com_show_status, and especially Com_show_tables (19 /sec!)) Consider whether it might be slowing the system down more than it is worth. There seems to be a monitoring process that runs once a second. If you will be using text from places other than Western Europe, consider switching to utf8mb4.
#Milf warrior princess upgrade#
Remove innodb_log_files_in_group before you upgrade to 10.6. Later, if the dataset grows, consider raising the value. Innodb_buffer_pool_size seems to be bigger than necessary for the dataset size. In some cases it leads to extra RAM allocations, which could lead to swapping, which is terrible for performance. In general, do not blindly increase settings. Setting changes recommended: table_open_cache = 10000 Uptime = 21:41:20 some GLOBAL STATUS values may not be meaningful yet.
0 kommentar(er)
